Data Records
The data in this occurrence resource has been published as a Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A), which is a standardized format for sharing biodiversity data as a set of one or more data tables. The core data table contains 324 records.
This IPT archives the data and thus serves as the data repository. The data and resource metadata are available for download in the downloads section. The versions table lists other versions of the resource that have been made publicly available and allows tracking changes made to the resource over time.
Downloads
Download the latest version of this resource data as a Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A) or the resource metadata as EML or RTF:
Versions
The table below shows only published versions of the resource that are publicly accessible.
How to cite
Researchers should cite this work as follows:
Sawe T, Kaniki A, Gideon H, Kissima A, Munishi P, Mbwambo J, Jang’andu M, David B, Sigani B, Uisso A, Njovangwa G, Massawe J, Nkya S, Kajembe J (2022): Occurrence and distribution of spores producing plants in Tanzania: Collection of Preserved Specimens at TAFORI herbarium
Rights
Researchers should respect the following rights statement:
The publisher and rights holder of this work is TanBIF. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.
GBIF Registration
This resource has been registered with GBIF, and assigned the following GBIF UUID: 8f1f1bf0-99f8-4ee6-b02f-6c5b570203d6. TanBIF publishes this resource, and is itself registered in GBIF as a data publisher endorsed by Tanzania Biodiversity Information Facility.
Keywords
Occurrence; Pteridophytes; Dataset; Specimen
Contacts
Who created the resource:
Who can answer questions about the resource:
Who filled in the metadata:
Who else was associated with the resource:
Geographic Coverage
Data presented in this dataset were collected in different location in Tanzania
Bounding Coordinates | South West [-90, -180], North East [90, 180] |
---|
Taxonomic Coverage
The dataset has 21 families whereby Aspleniaceae (25.6%), Pteridaceae (18.8%) and Polypodiaceae (9.3%) are the dominant.
Temporal Coverage
Formation Period | 1920 - 20000 |
---|
Project Data
No Description available
Title | Enhancing accessibility of forest flora data in Tanzania |
---|---|
Identifier | BID-AF2020-038-INS |
The personnel involved in the project:
Sampling Methods
Data presented in this data set were collected during implementation of various research projects in Tanzania. Plant materials were collected and pressed in the field, dried, identified and mounted on sheet bearing detailed labels, preserved and fixed into folders, then stored in cabinet’s cardboards systematically and sequentially (Alexiades, 1996). Every sheet of specimens contains standard information for herbarium collections, including; taxonomic identification, locality information, geographical coordinates, collector information, and ecological data. In addition, the specimens have been treated to prevent pests damage.
Study Extent | Specimen preserved at Lushoto Silviculture Research Center comes from all regions of Tanzania. |
---|
Method step description:
- The information on the specimen labels was our data source. To digitize each specimen, we followed three steps: data capture, data cleaning, and data publication. In the data capture process, we extracted all the information on the specimen’s label, and we input the information into Microsoft Excel spreadsheets using Darwin-Core format. In this process, we grouped the specimen information into specific categories of Darwin Core data standards. We used “GEOlocate” (https://www.geo-locate.org/default.html) to acquire the coordinates of the specimens lacking geographical coordinates. We obtained the coordinates by geo-referencing the name of the village or location written on the preserved specimen. Afterwards, we conducted data cleaning to ensure data consistency and adherence to Darwin Core standards. We mainly used “data validator” tool available under GBIF website (https://www.gbif.org/tools/data-validator) to identify missing or incorrect information in our data set. To verify the taxonomic nomenclature, we used “species matching” tool available under GBIF website (https://www.gbif.org/tools/species-lookup), the Plant list (http://www.theplantlist.org/), and World flora Online (http://www.worldfloraonline.org/). All the tools we used are open-source software or available as an open online platform.
Additional Metadata
Alternative Identifiers | https://ipt.tanbif.costech.or.tz/resource?r=pteridophytes_lsrc |
---|